This post is a follow-up on a recent blog post containing a photo that may, or may not, be my great-great-great-grandfather Jermiah Garner. I've written lots about Jeremiah, who led an out of the ordinary life, and since my blog is searchable you can read more about him if you are so inclined.
This is the photograph that started it all. It was labeled, Jeremiah Garner and his [third] wife Angeline Peck, the couple in the front row. I had my doubts about this photo. For one thing, the lady seated next to Jeremiah looks older than him to me; Angeline was younger than Jeremiah. She also seems a tad old to be the mother of the young child standing next to her. However, it's a sad but true fact that women don't age as well as men. I've looked this up in my research and it has something to do with hormones, or a lack thereof. Which we are not going to delve into further in this blog.
Today I thought I would take another look at this puzzle, so I uploaded a close up of Angeline from the group shot to my favorite photo editing site, BeFunky.com
It appears poor Angeline may have been suffering from hair loss at the time this picture was taken. Various illnesses and syndromes could be responsible, it's not the first time I've seen this in my tree. BeFunky has lots of tools to play with, and I've used them many times, but today I noticed a brand new plaything, Old Photo Restorer! I had to try that.
After restoration, this is what Angeline looked like...
I had noticed BeFunky also offered a colorizing tool, so of couse I tried that too...
You can see Angeline now looks younger. No spring chicken, but I could easily believe this lady was around the age of thirty-nine, which she would have been at the time. After my edits, Angeline's age in the photo no longer really concerns me. I'm still going to keep digging though, it's hard to trust that online photos are always who they claim to be. For instance, there is one circulating on Ancestry right now purporting to be the wedding photo from Angeline's first marriage (see below).
Nope, she still is over twenty-six.
No comments:
Post a Comment