I conduct
genealogical research using material from the Yale University library, I really
do. Just saying that makes me feel
positively scholarly! Not finding the
book in question locally, my youngest, who is enrolled at RIT in Rochester, borrowed it from Yale through the RIT library for me. “The O’Dwyers
of Kilnamanagh” was written by Sir Michael O’Dwyer, and is a fascinating read. Actually I found the “Sir” business a little
off-putting. How does a Roman Catholic
from Tipperary become a Sir? And why
would he want to?
I enjoyed reading
the book which seems very well researched, and recommend it to anyone with O’Dwyer
ancestry, but still, that “Sir” nagged at me.
So I decided to read up on Sir Michael.
His obituary describes him as “an Irishman to his backbone”; of course
that assessment came from an English acquaintance. The more I read, the less eager I was to
claim him as a family member. I already
had doubts after reading in the aforementioned book that he thought Ireland was
really better off under British rule. Turns
out, before Sir Michael wrote the book he was the appointed Lieutenant Governor
of the Punjab; that troubled British outpost in India. The 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre occurred
during his tenure and unbelievably, he described that shooting of unarmed
civilian protestors, as “a correct action”.
Shortly after that he was relieved of his post. Real retribution came about twenty years
later when in 1940 he was assassinated in London by Udhan Singh, an Indian
national in retaliation for the massacre.
Just three years previous
to the atrocity in India, educated Irishmen, not so different from O’Dwyer, had
taken over Dublin’s GPO and declared Ireland’s independence from the very empire
Sir Michael served; and for their trouble they had been executed by that
empire. How to account for the
disparity? And for the fact that even
some Dubliners in 1916 disavowed the men in the GPO who struck for Ireland’s
freedom? Did they too believe they were
better off under foreign rule, or had they just given up and accepted the
status quo? I think the latter is
probably the case, the result of centuries of subjugation.
If I truly were a
scholar, I might be better able to understand the differences in
perception. But for now, I see little to
connect Sir Michael to my O’Dwyers who were dispossessed peasants from a small
upland community in South Tipperary. I’m
sure we descend from different branches.
No comments:
Post a Comment